Measure of Physical Activity for Health Promotion and Education Research

Adam Knowlden

Abstract


Objectives: Accurate and reliable measurement of physical activity (PA) is critical for accuracy of health education and promotion research and evaluation. In terms of research, PA measurement allows researchers to model the correlates and determinants of PA. From an evaluation perspective, measurement allows researchers to gauge the efficacy of interventions designed to increase or sustain PA. A variety of direct and indirect PA monitoring methods are available to researchers and practitioners. The purpose of this research was to review methods of measuring physical activity over time and identify best practices for application. Methods: A total of 21 articles were extracted from Medline, CINHAL, and ERIC databases for this review. Monitoring techniques analyzed included doubly labeled water, indirect calorimetry, motion sensors, global positioning system, global geographic information systems, heart rate monitors, direct observation, activity logs, and self-report questionnaires. Strengths and limitations, application, cost of the data collection, and the accuracy of the resulting data was elucidated. Results: PA is an important domain of health promotion and health education research. Accurate and reliable measurement of PA is critical to increasing the internal validity of health education interventions. Conclusions: Ultimately, the research questions that underlie a research project should determine the measurement tool researchers apply. In making a final decision, expertise, resources, and funding of the program must be considered. Even the most advanced monitoring tools have limitations. Researchers must be cognizant of the limitations of the measurement techniques they apply and make efforts to reduce biases associated with their selected measurement method.


References


Adamo KB, Prince SA, Tricco AC, Connor-Gorber S, and Tremblay M. A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity 4: 2-27, 2009.

Ainsworth BE. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 32: S498, 2000.

Ainsworth BE. How do I measure physical activity in my patients? Questionnaires and objective methods. British Journal of Sports Medicine 43: 6-9, 2009.

Barreira TV, Kang M, Caputo JL, Farley RS, and Renfrow MS. Validation of the Actiheart monitor for the measurement of physical activity. Int J Exerc Sci 2: 60-71, 2009.

Bauman A, Phongsavan P, Schoeppe S, and Owen N. Physical activity measurement-a primer for health promotion. Promotion & Education 13: 92-103, 2006.

Berlin JE, Storti KL, and Brach JS. Using activity monitors to measure physical activity in free-living conditions. Physical Therapy 86: 1137-1145, 2006.

Bravata Dm S-SCSV and et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 298: 2296-2304, 2007.

Brown WH, Pfeiffer KA, McIver KL, Dowda M, Almeida MJCA, and Pate RR. Assessing Preschool Children's Physical Activity: The Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Preschool Version. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 77: 167-176, 2006.

Corder K, Brage Sr, Wareham NJ, and Ekelund U. Comparison of PAEE from combined and separate heart rate and movement models in children. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 37: 1761-1767, 2005.

Crowne DP and Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology 24: 349-354, 1960.

DeLany JP. Measurement of energy expenditure. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 58: 129-134, 2012.

Forsén L, Loland NW, Vuillemin A, Chinapaw MJM, van Poppel MNM, Mokkink LB, van Mechelen W, and Terwee CB. Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Medicine 40: 601-623, 2010.

Loprinzi PD and Cardinal BJ. Measuring children's physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness 9: 15-23, 2011.

Matthews C. Use of self-report instruments to assess physical activity. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Inc, 2002.

Rodríguez DA, Brown AL, and Troped PJ. Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 37: S572-581, 2005.

Schneider PL, Bassett JDR, Thompson DL, Pronk NP, and Bielak KM. Effects of a 10,000 steps per day goal in overweight adults. American Journal of Health Promotion 21: 85-89, 2006.

Trost SG. Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: current issues, future directions. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 29: 32-36, 2001.

Tudor-Locke C and Bassett D. How many steps/day are enough?: preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Medicine 34: 1-8, 2004.

Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, Lee SM, and Swan PD. Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 30: 666-676, 2005.

Tudor-Locke CE and Myers AM. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Medicine 31: 91-100, 2001.

2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. [Accessed , September 8, 2013]. http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/

Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, and Vanhees L. Assessment of physical activity-a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation 17: 127-139, 2010.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

CIAFEL, Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure